Indus Water Treaty: History, Suspension , Significance, Concerns and Solutions
The Indus Water Treaty (IWT), signed between India and Pakistan in 1960, was suspended by India on April 23, 2025, following the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which killed 26 people. Below is an overview of the suspension, its context, implications, and related details based on available information.
History
The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) is a water-sharing agreement signed on 19 September 1960 between India and Pakistan with the mediation of the World Bank. The treaty was created to resolve the water dispute that arose after the 1947 partition between India and Pakistan.
- background :
- After partition, the waters of the Indus river system (Indus and its tributaries: Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Sutlej, Beas) became important to both countries.
- In 1948, India escalated tensions by blocking water from the Ravi River, highlighting the need for water sharing.
- The World Bank began mediation in the 1950s, and after protracted negotiations the treaty was signed in 1960.
- Key provisions :
- Water sharing : Eastern rivers (Ravi, Sutlej, Beas) were allocated to India and western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab) to Pakistan. Pakistan gets about 80% of the water and India gets 20%.
- Uses : India is allowed non-consumptive uses (hydropower, irrigation, storage) on western rivers, but cannot obstruct water flow.
- Institutional Framework : Permanent Indus Commission was established for coordination and dispute settlement between the two countries.
- Dispute settlement : Article IX of the Treaty provides for a three-step mechanism (Commission, intergovernmental negotiations, neutral experts/arbitration).
Importance
The Indus Water Treaty is considered a model of international water cooperation, particularly because it remained in effect despite tense relations between India and Pakistan. Its significance is as follows:
- Regional stability : The treaty reduced the possibility of water wars between the two countries.
- Economic benefits :
- The agricultural economy of Pakistan, particularly the Punjab province, is dependent on the Indus River system.
- India got water for hydroelectric projects (like Bhakra-Nangal) and irrigation.
- Role of the World Bank : The treaty is a successful example of mediation by the World Bank, which also provided financial assistance to both countries for infrastructure (such as the Mangal Dam in Pakistan).
- Flexibility : The treaty remained intact even during the wars of 1965, 1971 and 1999, which shows its strength.
Background of the Suspension
- Triggering Event: The suspension was announced after a deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22, 2025, which India linked to "cross-border terrorism" supported by Pakistan. The Indian government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, cited national security concerns and Pakistan's alleged failure to curb terrorism as reasons for the suspension.
- Official Statement: Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri declared, "The Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 will be held in abeyance with immediate effect, until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism."
- Additional Measures: Alongside the suspension, India implemented other punitive actions, including:
- Closing the Attari-Wagah border post.
- Barring Pakistani nationals from traveling to India under the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme.
- Declaring Pakistani High Commission defense advisors persona non grata.
- Reducing the strength of both countries' High Commissions to 30 officials by May 1, 2025.
Implications of the Suspension
For Pakistan
- Agriculture and Economy: Pakistan relies heavily on the Western Rivers for 80% of its irrigation, supporting 16 million hectares of cultivated land, which contributes ~25% to its GDP. Suspension could disrupt water supply, reduce crop yields (wheat, rice, sugarcane, cotton), and exacerbate food insecurity, particularly in Punjab and Sindh.
- Energy Sector: Hydropower plants like Tarbela, Mangla, and Neelum-Jhelum depend on these rivers. Reduced water flow could worsen Pakistan’s energy crisis, increasing reliance on costly coal imports (19 million tons annually, costing $1.5 billion in 2021).
- Water Stress: Pakistan is already among the most water-stressed countries, with declining per capita water availability. Any disruption could fuel domestic unrest.
- Long-Term Impact: While immediate effects are limited due to India’s lack of infrastructure to stop water flow, the suspension signals potential future disruptions, creating uncertainty for Pakistan’s water planning.
For India
- Strategic Leverage: The suspension is seen as a pressure tactic to compel Pakistan to address terrorism. It shifts India’s stance from diplomatic restraint to using water as a strategic tool.
- Infrastructure Limitations: India cannot immediately stop or divert Western Rivers’ flow due to insufficient storage or diversion infrastructure. Building reservoirs or dams would take years and require significant investment, with ecological and regional risks (e.g., flooding in Jammu and Kashmir).
- Operational Freedom: Suspension lifts restrictions on India’s projects, such as reservoir flushing (e.g., Kishanganga), which can now occur outside the treaty’s mandated August monsoon period, potentially affecting Pakistan’s sowing season.
Bilateral and Regional Impact
- Escalation of Tensions: Pakistan has called the suspension an “act of war” and vowed to respond with “full force,” legally and politically, escalating bilateral tensions.
- Legal Challenges: Pakistan argues the treaty, as a World Bank-brokered agreement, has no provision for unilateral suspension and plans to seek legal recourse, possibly via the World Bank or arbitration. India may cite Article 62 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, claiming a “fundamental change of circumstances” (e.g., terrorism) justifies suspension.
- Regional Stability: The move risks destabilizing South Asia, with potential for retaliatory actions by Pakistan, such as closing airspace or further militarizing the border.
Pakistan’s Response
- Official Stance: Pakistan’s National Security Committee, led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, condemned the suspension as “unilateral, unjust, and politically motivated,” asserting that water is a “vital national interest” for its 240 million people.
- Legal Action: Pakistan plans to challenge the suspension through the World Bank and international forums, arguing it violates international law and the treaty’s binding nature.
- Rhetoric: Pakistan’s Power Minister Sardar Awais Leghari called the suspension “water warfare,” warning that any attempt to stop water flow would be met with force. Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar dismissed India’s terrorism allegations as baseless, demanding evidence.
Practical and Legal Considerations
- Immediate Impact: The suspension won’t immediately stop water flow to Pakistan due to India’s lack of infrastructure. However, halting data sharing, technical meetings, and cross-border inspections could disrupt cooperative water management.
- Legal Status: The IWT lacks an exit clause, and unilateral suspension may be challenged as a breach of international law. However, enforcement is complex without a designated body, and India’s temporary “abeyance” avoids formal abrogation.
- World Bank’s Role: As the treaty’s guarantor, the World Bank may face pressure to mediate, but its ability to enforce compliance is limited. Pakistan may seek its intervention, while India argues that terrorism undermines the treaty’s cooperative spirit.
Potential Solutions
To address the crisis and mitigate escalation, the following steps could be considered:
- Diplomatic Engagement:
- Resume bilateral talks to address terrorism concerns and restore treaty cooperation, possibly with third-party mediation (e.g., World Bank or neutral countries).
- Establish a joint anti-terrorism framework to rebuild trust.
- Legal Resolution:
- Utilize the IWT’s dispute resolution mechanism (Permanent Indus Commission, neutral expert, arbitration) to negotiate the suspension’s terms and implications.
- Seek clarity on the suspension’s duration and conditions for resumption.
- Infrastructure Development:
- Pakistan could invest in water storage and alternative sources (e.g., groundwater, rainwater harvesting) to reduce dependence on the Western Rivers.
- India could prioritize sustainable water management to avoid ecological damage from potential dam projects.
- International Support:
- Engage global powers (e.g., US, China) to pressure both sides for de-escalation and adherence to international norms.
- Leverage SAARC or other regional platforms for dialogue on shared resources.
- Treaty Modernization:
Conclusion
India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty in April 2025 marks a significant escalation in India-Pakistan relations, driven by the Pahalgam terrorist attack and long-standing frustrations over cross-border terrorism. While the immediate impact on Pakistan’s water supply is limited, the long-term implications for its agriculture, energy, and economy are severe, with potential to destabilize the region. Pakistan’s vow to treat water diversion as an “act of war” and pursue legal action underscores the risk of further conflict. Diplomatic, legal, and cooperative measures are critical to de-escalate tensions and preserve the treaty’s legacy as a model of water-sharing amidst adversity.
UWAA TEAM @ JPSC /UPSC/BPSC
Whatsapp/Call +919608166520
----------------------------------------------------------------
14TH JPSC ONLINE CLASS
FEES : 2000 RS /MONTH
Only 100 Students Batch -7PM-9M
NCERT CLASS – JPSC/BPSC/BSSC/JSSC - 7AM-8AM
https://www.youtube.com/@uwaajpscdhumkudiya
JOIN US - +919608166520
JPSC EXAM 2023 PT रिजल्ट - 38 में 34 अभ्यर्थी उत्तीर्ण
सीमित अभ्यर्थी उच्च सफलता दर
Telegram : https://t.me/UWAAUPSC
Comments
Post a Comment